US captive coalition and IRS discuss offshore business in Cayman
Wednesday, January 30th, 2008The influence of the United States in Cayman offshore business is obvious and therefore American criticism of Cayman has already been discussed.
In the middle of January 2008, a large coalition of US-based captives met with top officials of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department in Washington, DC in order to convince them to reverse proposed tax changes. The proposed changes are expected to have a bad influence on US-based captives and potentially drive business offshore.
US industry experts suspect that the Cayman Islands along with Bermuda would become the primary beneficiaries if captives move offshore, however US business could move also to European domiciles.
The US Coalition for Fairness to Captive Insurers consists of 46 members from captive companies, states, and various organisations including a large US insurance association – the Risk and Insurance Managers Society.
The proposed IRS changes would eliminate tax deductions for money in reserves used to pay for future claims and losses for certain captives. But these deductions would be allowed only at the time the actual claims are paid out, which could lead to the situation when millions of USD in taxes will be collected up front.
It is not known yet, but the IRS proposals could be adopted as early as in 2009.
In December 2007, the coalition submitted a report consisting of 35 pages which includes the arguments to the IRS and it expects a hearing on this case within 90 days.
According to captive managers in the Cayman Islands, some companies considering setting up a captive are delaying the decision because of the increased uncertainty in the market.
In accordance with the current tax code, US captives enjoy a level playing field with those offshore, and therefore many offshore captives in the Cayman Islands and Bermuda have decided to be taxed as if they were onshore.
According to Insurance Managers Association president and Aon Insurance managing director, Dan MacLean, offshore experts are waiting to see what happens. He said that “often the offshore jurisdictions are subject to the critical eye of onshore policymakers, but this is an example of how legislation can quickly affect an industry, whether it is offshore or onshore.”